https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996798
Tom "spot" Callaway <spotrh(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spotrh(a)gmail.com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags| |fedora-review+
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |spotrh(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway <spotrh(a)gmail.com> ---
APPROVED (generated packages are so simple)
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
ghc-cached-json-file-devel.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.2.6/lib/cached-json-file-0.1.1/libHScached-json-file-0.1.1-9nkhzHX7d8f8HC0nyuYTuZ.a
ghc-cached-json-file-prof.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.2.6/lib/cached-json-file-0.1.1/libHScached-json-file-0.1.1-9nkhzHX7d8f8HC0nyuYTuZ_p.a
ghc-cached-json-file.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-cached-json-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-cached-json-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.2.6/lib/cached-json-file-0.1.1/libHScached-json-file-0.1.1-9nkhzHX7d8f8HC0nyuYTuZ_p.a
All safe to ignore for Haskell packages.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (BSD-3-Clause) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- doc subpackage okay
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- devel requires base package n-v-r
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996798
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...