https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807409
José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |jamatos(a)fc.up.pt
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |jamatos(a)fc.up.pt
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> ---
The package is simple. :-)
The complaints of fedora-review are:
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
The first is bogus.
The second makes sense on the paper but since this is binary package it already
requires R-core.
The third one and taking example of the rstudio review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
according to the link above it should be listed explicitly.
I have asked in the package mailing list for a clarification but meanwhile it
does not hurt to include it directly.
The package is approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component