https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259210
Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |decathorpe(a)gmail.com
CC| |decathorpe(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review?
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> ---
# FIXME: no license files detected
This needs to be addressed in some way.
It looks like the upstream repository actually contains license files, but they
are not linked into this subdirectory, so "cargo publish" will not include
them. Both the Apache-2.0 and MIT licenses require that redistributed sources
contain a copy of the actual license text, so this is a hard requirement for
us.
Please report this to the upstream project and ask them to include license
texts in all published crates.
Here's an example of a similar report that I filed a while ago:
https://github.com/Devolutions/picky-rs/issues/230
It is usually fixed easily by adding symbolic links:
https://github.com/djc/askama/pull/947
PS: I'm curious, what are you packaging this crate for?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259210
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...