Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-03 10:03:10
(In reply to comment #1)
Only issue: line 40 is too long
- md5sums and sha1sums match
- licensing good
- naming fine
- rpmlint clean:
$ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
felix-osgi-core.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
For those playing along at home, Alex and I discussed the possibility of using
the Eclipse version of these OSGi classes. This would mean a tighter loop at a
build level between Eclipse and Jetty. It also would mean porting work to
bring Felix up to the different (newer) versions of these OSGi classes in
Eclipse. At this time, it's probably easiest to have this separate, small
Also, it may be best to coordinate with the JPackage folks to split their
monolithic felix package like you've done so that there aren't file conflicts.
At the moment, since Fedora doesn't explicitly support JPackage compatibility,
this is probably okay. Longer term, it'd be nice to interoperate.
Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-core.spec
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.