Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python-tate-bilinear-pairing - A Python 2/3 library for calculating Tate bilinear pairing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
Summary: Review Request: python-tate-bilinear-pairing - A Python 2/3 library for calculating Tate bilinear pairing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: philip.worrall@googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: ---
Hello,
I have packaged up the python take bilinear pairing library.
Spec URL: http://www.freefilehosting.net/python-tate-bilinear-pairing SRPM URL: http://www.freefilehosting.net/python-tate-bilinear-pairing-023-1fc15src Description: This package is a Python 2 library for calculating Tate bilinear pairing, especially on super-singular elliptic curve $E:y^2=x^3-x+1$ in affine coordinates defined over a Galois Field $GF(3^m)$.
This is a package in response to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796640.
Regards, Phil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
homerxing homer.xing@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |homer.xing@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from homerxing homer.xing@gmail.com 2012-03-30 07:47:16 EDT --- Great work :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@gmail.co | |m
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #0)
Spec URL: http://www.freefilehosting.net/python-tate-bilinear-pairing SRPM URL: http://www.freefilehosting.net/python-tate-bilinear-pairing-023-1fc15src
Please don't provide your files via such a file hoster. Just use Dropbox or anything similar. I don't want to type captchas again and again. In any case, we need locations which are directly downloadable.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- BTW, are you still a packager? If not, add "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" in the "Blocks:" field.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- *** Bug 796640 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- As far as I can see, you are not in the packagers group. Adding FE-NEEDSPONSOR.
If you are not willing to maintain the package in Fedora, please let us know.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- Any news...?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #7 from philip.worrall@googlemail.com --- Im not currently a packager, still looking for a sponsor.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com --- I've been unable to download the packages to take a look.
Please notice the following: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Uploa...
Of course, the rest of the page is worth reading, too.
It's also highly recommended that you try to review your own package with the help of the Review Guidelines page, commenting on steps like the output of rpmlint and a test-build: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(philip.worrall@go | |oglemail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |msuchy@redhat.com Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed| |2015-07-21 09:28:21
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com --- Closing due long inactivity. Feel free to reopen if you want to continue.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
philip.worrall@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Resolution|DEFERRED |--- Flags|needinfo?(philip.worrall@go | |oglemail.com) | Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #10 from philip.worrall@googlemail.com --- Greetings,
I would like to try and pursue this again as I now have a bit more time having finished my PhD.
I would also appreciate if someone from the sponsors group would sponsor me as this would be my first package upload to fedora.
The package contains a python library for calculating tate bi-linear pairing and includes both python2 and python3 sub-packages. In order to run without warnings I have added a couple of patches to fix a couple of utf8 encoding issues where the documentation contains non-ascii characters but upstream do not set the proper encoding. Both such patches have been sent upstream by email (this is noted in the spec file)
I have attached my review and details of the files included in the package (the output from rpmls). I have tried to follow the general packaging guidelines and those specific to packaging python modules.
My FAS username: worralph SPEC file: https://worralph.fedorapeople.org/python-tate_bilinear_pairing.spec
Copr repo (where i have built this package for rawhide): https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/worralph/python/build/123871/
Package Review (based on the fedora-review template with my own comments). I have left fields blank that i am unsure of and need a bit of help. ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [X ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/python- tate_bilinear_pairing/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [X]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/tate_bilinear_pairing(python-tate_bilinear_pairing, python2-tate_bilinear_pairing) [-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [X]: Changelog in prescribed format. [X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [X]: Package does not generate any conflict. [X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [X]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [X]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [X]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [X]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
PW: I have sent an email about this.
[X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-tate_bilinear_pairing , python3-tate_bilinear_pairing [X]: Package functions as described.
PW: the testsuite passes for both py2 and py3
[X]: Latest version is packaged. [-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [X]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
PW: i have made to patches both of which i have sent upstream. The patches are used to correct minor utf8 encoding issues.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [X]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [X]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-1.fc21.noarch.rpm python3-tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-1.fc21.noarch.rpm python-tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-1.fc21.src.rpm python2-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt python2-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al python3-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt python3-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al python-tate_bilinear_pairing.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt python-tate_bilinear_pairing.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt python3-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al python3-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/tate_bilinear_pairing/ <urlopen error [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution> python2-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt python2-tate_bilinear_pairing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
PW: these are minor spelling errors relating to the et al. in the reference to the paper used by the upstream author.
Requires -------- python3-tate_bilinear_pairing (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi)
python2-tate_bilinear_pairing (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi)
Provides -------- python3-tate_bilinear_pairing: python3-tate_bilinear_pairing
python2-tate_bilinear_pairing: python-tate_bilinear_pairing python2-tate_bilinear_pairing
Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/tate_bilinear_pairing/tate_bilinea... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4ad368190140c89b24a85e39fbad3ac9ee83d5e9f3227644d08375fcb9b3dc89 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4ad368190140c89b24a85e39fbad3ac9ee83d5e9f3227644d08375fcb9b3dc89
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec -n rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-1.fc21.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-21-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
rpmls python2-tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-py2.7.egg-info -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__init__.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__init__.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__init__.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/ecc.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/ecc.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/ecc.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/eta.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/eta.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/eta.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f32m.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f32m.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f32m.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f33m.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f33m.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f33m.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f36m.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f36m.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f36m.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f3m.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f3m.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f3m.pyo drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/python2-tate_bilinear_pairing -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/python2-tate_bilinear_pairing/README
rpmls python3-tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing-0.6-py3.4.egg-info -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__init__.py drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__ -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-34.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-34.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/ecc.cpython-34.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/ecc.cpython-34.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/eta.cpython-34.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/eta.cpython-34.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f32m.cpython-34.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f32m.cpython-34.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f33m.cpython-34.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f33m.cpython-34.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f36m.cpython-34.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f36m.cpython-34.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f3m.cpython-34.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/__pycache__/f3m.cpython-34.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/ecc.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/eta.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f32m.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f33m.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f36m.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/tate_bilinear_pairing/f3m.py drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/python3-tate_bilinear_pairing -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/python3-tate_bilinear_pairing/README
Thanks.
Phil
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #11 from philip.worrall@googlemail.com ---
FYI: Urls to patch0 and patch1
https://worralph.fedorapeople.org/python-tate_bilinear_pairing-fix-read-utf8...
https://worralph.fedorapeople.org/python-tate_bilinear_pairing-fix-read-utf8...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #12 from philip.worrall@googlemail.com ---
FYI: Urls to patch0 and patch1
https://worralph.fedorapeople.org/python-tate_bilinear_pairing-fix-header-en...
https://worralph.fedorapeople.org/python-tate_bilinear_pairing-fix-read-utf8...
(In reply to philip.worrall from comment #11)
FYI: Urls to patch0 and patch1
https://worralph.fedorapeople.org/python-tate_bilinear_pairing-fix-read-utf8. patch
https://worralph.fedorapeople.org/python-tate_bilinear_pairing-fix-read-utf8. patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |williamjmorenor@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |williamjmorenor@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(philip.worrall@go | |oglemail.com)
--- Comment #13 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- Do you want to continue with this review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
philip.worrall@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(philip.worrall@go | |oglemail.com) |
--- Comment #14 from philip.worrall@googlemail.com --- Yes I would like to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #15 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- OK
I will take your request to become a Fedora Packager Maintainer.
Please update your spec to the latest python packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
Also I will request to you to done some informal reviews to become familiar with the Fedora Packaging Guidelines.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(philip.worrall@go | |oglemail.com)
--- Comment #16 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- Any advance here there is more than a month ago since last update.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|williamjmorenor@gmail.com | Assignee|williamjmorenor@gmail.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(philip.worrall@go | |oglemail.com) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |orion@cora.nwra.com Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed|2015-07-21 09:28:21 |2017-03-10 22:48:14
--- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com --- Reopen if you wish to continue.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org