Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225898
Summary: Merge Review: imake Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: krh@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: imake
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/imake/ Initial Owner: krh@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: imake
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225898
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus@free.fr
------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2007-10-25 15:38 EST ------- This package should be split in 5. There is no reason to have all in one.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225898
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-03-21 09:52:29 EDT --- I agree.
No progress on this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225898
Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-18 20:03:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
I agree.
Me too.
No progress on this?
Ping.
- %{_datadir}/X11 is owned by filesystem and shouldn't be owned by this package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225898
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limburgher@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |limburgher@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com 2012-04-03 13:36:38 EDT --- ajax, I'm looking at reviewing this, and I could also see a case for splitting it, since it's 5 separate upstream tarballs, granted from the same source, so it would be easier to maintain. I'd suggest retirement, but they're still maintained upstream. If you submit rename reviews for each, I'll do them. If you want me to do the splitting, I could do that as well.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla