Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok
Alias: perl-Test-use-ok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2007-04-10 23:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
> Missing:
>
> BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
> BR: perl(Test::More)
> BR: perl(Test::Harness)
So updated (thanks for the catch). Are we at the point now where we should
expect to list all module dependencies, including code? (e.g., not just
ExtUtils::MakeMaker).
Well, the list above is the result of testing the latest perl
packaging (as
discussed on perl-devel-list@), which has several modules formerly contained in
"perl" split out. I don't know about RH's plans nor whether or when
we're going
to see this split perl package in Fedora.
A side-effect of this split-out is building perl-modules having to explictly BR:
those "now/soon to be split-out" modules formerly having been in
"perl" they
actually use when building. In most cases this is "ExtUtils::MakeMaker", but
ins
some cases, it is more - This package is one of those case.
More generally: Blindly adding "BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)" isn't the
solution. One has to track down these modules individually. Fortunately, most
package bomb out with build-failures pretty hard in a buildsystems carrying the
"split perl" package.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.