Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame
------- Additional Comments From steve(a)silug.org 2006-05-27 16:28 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
Only one of the files (lib/OpenFrame/Argument/Blob.pm) seems to have
of the license. I don't think that's enough to suggest the license for the
I've emailed the author (the one listed in that file anyway) for clarification.
I wonder about the need for these:
Requires: perl(File::Type) >= 0.01
Requires: perl(HTTP::Request) >= 0.01
Requires: perl(IO::Null) >= 0.01
The versions are so low that they seem to have been put in as placeholders. RPM
should figure out all of these on its own. (It doesn't find HTTP::Request but
it does find other modules, all provided by perl-libwww-perl.)
Fixed in -2.
no response available
at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Pipeline/Dispatch.pm line 74
I'm not sure if the first is a mock artifact or a problem with
the test suite.
It happens when I'm not running under mock either.
all skipped: - do not have File::Find::Rule installed
The second is fixed up with the obvious BR:.
Also fixed in -2.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.