https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268659

--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7129670 (failed)

Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field

--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268659

--- Comment #4 from Nolan Poe npgo22@gmail.com --- I have found a package to co-maintain and have been sponsored. As a result, I no longer need one.

[fedora-review-service-build] Spec URL: https://npgo22.fedorapeople.org/perl-parallel-forker/perl-parallel-forker.sp... SRPM URL: https://npgo22.fedorapeople.org/perl-parallel-forker/perl-parallel-forker-1....

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268659

Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |AutomationTriaged

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7189624 (succeeded)

Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268659

Nolan Poe npgo22@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| |Trivial

--- Comment #9 from Nolan Poe npgo22@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://npgo22.fedorapeople.org/perl-parallel-forker/perl-parallel-forker.sp... SRPM URL: https://npgo22.fedorapeople.org/perl-parallel-forker/perl-parallel-forker-1.... Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=115937043

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268659

Peter Oliver mavit@mavit.org.uk changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|Trivial |Trivial AwaitingSubmitter Flags| |needinfo?(npgo22@gmail.com)

--- Comment #11 from Peter Oliver mavit@mavit.org.uk --- - Perl RPM packages are usually named, e.g., perl-Parallel-Forker (i.e., with the same case as the contained Perl module, Parallel::Forker). - Please specify BuildRequires for individual modules required, rather than pulling in lots of unneeded packages with `BuildRequires: perl`. - Please contact upstream to ask that they include the licence text in a separate file. - I believe that the License field should contain an OR not an AND. - I think it makes more sense to specify README.pod with %doc rather than %license.

Package Review ==============

Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 3", "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/perl-parallel-forker/licensecheck.txt [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share, /usr/share/man/man3, /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/man, /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl, /usr/share/perl5, /usr [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share, /usr/share/man/man3, /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/man, /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl, /usr/share/perl5, /usr [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl: [!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [?]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages.

Rpmlint ------- Checking: perl-parallel-forker-1.260-6.fc41.noarch.rpm perl-parallel-forker-1.260-6.fc41.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmppomzdgkm')] checks: 32, packages: 2

perl-parallel-forker.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A perl library for managing parallel processes. perl-parallel-forker.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A perl library for managing parallel processes. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s

Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "perl-parallel-forker". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1

0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s

Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/veripool/parallel-forker/archive/refs/tags/v1.260/paralle... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : c629f46c11f752078e9e86f540902b44035b616150aeb509af1b70808c958ffe CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : c629f46c11f752078e9e86f540902b44035b616150aeb509af1b70808c958ffe

Requires -------- perl-parallel-forker (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): perl(:VERSION) perl(Carp) perl(IO::File) perl(POSIX) perl(Parallel::Forker::Process) perl(Proc::ProcessTable) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl-libs

Provides -------- perl-parallel-forker: perl(Parallel::Forker) perl(Parallel::Forker::Process) perl-parallel-forker

Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name perl-parallel-forker --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Perl Disabled plugins: Haskell, R, PHP, Python, Java, fonts, C/C++, Ocaml, SugarActivity Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH