https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227086

Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Depends On| |2217642

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217642 [Bug 2217642] Please update libplist to 2.3.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227086

Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ CC| |michel@michel-slm.name Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |michel@michel-slm.name

--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name --- LGTM. presumably upstream does not have a test suite

Package Review ==============

Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "X11 License [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General Public License, Version 2", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention)", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later". 15 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/davide/2227086-libimobiledevice- glue/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 3495 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Rpmlint ------- Checking: libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libimobiledevice-glue-devel-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm ====================================================== rpmlint session starts ====================================================== rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpklxtnjk1')] checks: 31, packages: 5

======================= 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.7 s =======================

Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm ====================================================== rpmlint session starts ====================================================== rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmplu1l3twy')] checks: 31, packages: 1

======================= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s =======================

Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 4

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s

Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/libimobiledevice/libimobiledevice-glue/releases/download/... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 160a70e2edc318312fc40b6a71f85bfdfabdfba10bcfc5bb6fb40ed95088f4a0 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 160a70e2edc318312fc40b6a71f85bfdfabdfba10bcfc5bb6fb40ed95088f4a0

Requires -------- libimobiledevice-glue (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libplist-2.0.so.4()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)

libimobiledevice-glue-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libimobiledevice-glue(x86-64) libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(libplist-2.0)

libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

Provides -------- libimobiledevice-glue: libimobiledevice-glue libimobiledevice-glue(x86-64) libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.so.0()(64bit)

libimobiledevice-glue-devel: libimobiledevice-glue-devel libimobiledevice-glue-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(libimobiledevice-glue-1.0)

libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.so.0.0.0-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo(x86-64)

libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource: libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource(x86-64)

Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2227086 -o=--enablerepo=davide-sidetag Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, C/C++, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, PHP, Perl, SugarActivity, Haskell, Ocaml, fonts, R, Python Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227086 Bug 2227086 depends on bug 2217642, which changed state.

Bug 2217642 Summary: Please update libplist to 2.3.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217642

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227086

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2024-467c3dd17e (libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-4.el10_0) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-467c3dd17e