[Bug 2315605] New: Review Request: libgeopm - C/C++ implementation of the GEOPM runtime service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Bug ID: 2315605 Summary: Review Request: libgeopm - C/C++ implementation of the GEOPM runtime service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: aekoroglu@linux.intel.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
SPEC Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/geopm/fedora-ra... SRPM Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/geopm/fedora-ra...
Description: The Global Extensible Open Power Manager (GEOPM) provides a framework to explore power and energy optimizations on platforms with heterogeneous mixes of computing hardware.
Users can monitor their system's energy and power consumption, and safely optimize system hardware settings to achieve energy efficiency and/or performance objectives.
Reproducible: Always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://geopm.github.io
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8091487 (failed)
Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.
- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Ali Erdinc Koroglu aekoroglu@linux.intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Depends On| |2315604
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315604 [Bug 2315604] Review Request: libgeopmd - C/C++ implementation of the GEOPM access service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Ali Erdinc Koroglu aekoroglu@linux.intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2315607
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315607 [Bug 2315607] Review Request: python-geopmpy - Python bindings for libgeopm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |negativo17@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |negativo17@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- Package looks good, nothing to object.
Couldn't this be built from the same SPEC file?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605 Bug 2315605 depends on bug 2315604, which changed state.
Bug 2315604 Summary: Review Request: libgeopmd - C/C++ implementation of the GEOPM access service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315604
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Ali Erdinc Koroglu aekoroglu@linux.intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(negativo17@gmail. | |com)
--- Comment #3 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu aekoroglu@linux.intel.com --- Hello Simone, I talked with the upstream developers couple of months ago and we agreed to create separate projects for libgeopmd, libgeopm, geopmdpy and geopmpy. That's why I did not build all of them from a single SPEC file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(negativo17@gmail. | |com) |
--- Comment #4 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- Sorry forgot to set fedora-review to "+", my bad.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315605
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RELEASE_PENDING
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgeopm
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com