Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135
--- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2009-12-02 17:11:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
> At least: from my point of view your review is very poor.
It's more "brief". I tried to build package locally, in mock and finally
in
koji, and it passed. Another important thing is license, and that's also ok.
Jochen, seriously, what was wrong here? Please point out any deficiencies of
the package, I have a feeling that the CVS request might be delayed for this
(other, older cvs requests have been processed), so I'd really like to have
this cleared up.
I gave it another check. There is missing one "must" from
java guidelines, and
that is "Require: java", jpackage-utils is not enough.
Fair enough. Fixed.
* I think, javadoc shouldn't be in %doc
Fixed.
* drop epoch from current changelog entry
Done.
New package:
SPEC:
http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xstream.spec
SRPM:
http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xstream-1.2.2-4.fc13.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.