--- Comment #7 from T. Orsava <torsava(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda from comment #6)
(In reply to T. Orsava from comment #4)
> (In reply to Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda from comment #2)
> > You probably don't want to mark PKG-INFO as %doc. Since it's in the
> > .egg-info directory, some other software may use it for processing metadata
> > about the package. Thus if someone installed the package without docs (`rpm
> > -i --excludedocs`), the package might appear broken.
> There are two PKG-INFO files, one in the .egg-info directory, and one in the
> root directory. I believe the second one can (and should?) be included in
Ah, this one. Sorry, that can be marked as %doc. I'm not sure if it should,
though. It seems that most of the information it provides is already
available in RPM metadata and some other info will probably not be that
interesting to normal users. Since there'll be PKG-INFO in the package
anyway, I'd probably not include this one.
I think this is a matter of taste, so I'll let you do the final decision and
just leave my "-0" here.
Ok in that case my apologies to Charalampos for suggesting he makes it so.
Also for future reference, we found out that the ".gitignore.in" file pointed
out by a lint warning should NOT be tampered with as it is actually integral to
the working of the package.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component