--- Comment #11 from Kalev Lember <klember(a)redhat.com> ---
Packaging looks nice and clean, but I'm wondering about the naming here.
Wouldn't it be cleaner to call the source package 'fontmake' as upstream
it, and then have 3 binary packages: fontmake, python2-fontmake,
python3-fontmake? Similar to how Debian is packaging it (it has very similar
python naming standards as we do):
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component