https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800429

Attila Lakatos alakatos@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alakatos@redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Attila Lakatos alakatos@redhat.com --- I do not see the SRPM and spec file. Did you forget to upload the link or am I missing something?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800429

--- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- This request is mainly a preparation to give a chance to the emulator box86 and to get it into Fedora with packaging: "Most x86 Games need OpenGL, so on ARM platforms, a solution like gl4es is probably needed." https://ameridroid.com/blogs/ameriblogs/how-to-run-x86-linux-applications-on...

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800429

Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppisar@redhat.com Assignee|projects.rg@smart.ms |nobody@fedoraproject.org Whiteboard| |NotReady

--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- I hid this review from a review listing. Once your package is ready, delete the "NotReady" word from a whiteboard field.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800429

--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Copied over from bug #1788327 (rewiew GL4ES):

(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #10)

(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)

...

Thanks for the hints. I'll continue asap due to limited time.

This request is mainly a preparation to give to the emulator box86 a chance and to get into Fedora with packaging: "Most x86 Games need OpenGL, so on ARM platforms, a solution like gl4es is probably needed." https://ameridroid.com/blogs/ameriblogs/how-to-run-x86-linux-applications-on... arm-linux-with-box86

As Fedora is concerned, arm (and aarch64) FLOSS drivers are using mesa and plain libGL already.

The only use case where this would be useful would be the PI downstream driver (not provided by Fedora) or Mali drivers (not provided by Fedora), and few others. So if you want box86 on arm with plain libGL and the related mesa drivers (vc4/v3d for PI and lima for Mali), nothing hold.

If you are interested in downstream drivers for PI, then I'm trying to "federate" various userspace in a dedicated rpi namespace in rpmfusion. The reason why it has to be dedicated is because a ffmpeg built with bcmhost enabled (PI downstream driver) would make the whole build PI specific. So my guess is that gl4es, once built with -DBCMHOST=1 would be also specific and not useful at all on Lima cases and others.

So that's the reason why I expect this build to be on copr. As I don't expect a generic build to be anything useful. At least can you submit a box86 review, so we can any if anything hold ?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800429 Bug 1800429 depends on bug 1788327, which changed state.

Bug 1788327 Summary: Review Request: gl4es - OpenGL to GL ES translation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG