https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022554
Ben Beasley <code(a)musicinmybrain.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(code@musicinmybra |
|in.net) |
--- Comment #5 from Ben Beasley <code(a)musicinmybrain.net> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
=======
- Dist tag is present.
OK; fedora-review does not understand rpmautospec.
- This is the first time I have seen rpmautospec combined with package
unretirement. It makes sense to do. Just make sure that you end up with a
release number higher than the last build (-34) to avoid unintended
downgrades, using the -b option to %autorelease if needed.
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/plotmm
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
OK; this is a review for unretirement.
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 1075200 bytes in 174 files.
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_documentation
You should make a new -doc subpackage. I suggest something like:
%package doc
Summary: Documentation for plotmm
BuildArch: noarch
%description doc
%{summary}.
%files doc
%license COPYING
%doc doc/html
(and remove the HTML documentation from the -devel package). You can keep
AUTHORS, ChangeLog, and README in the base package or move them to -doc at
your discretion.
- Be warned that modern Doxygen-generated HTML documentation is not suitable
for packaging, as it has relatively intractable issues with bundled and
minified JavaScript. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006555
for details. However, the ancient pre-generated documentation here is OK: it
lacks JavaScript, and the CSS is not minified.
If you ever re-build the documentation in the RPM build, which is possible to
do, then you will need to deal with this. The best solution is probably to
build a PDF instead of HTML. See
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cairomm/blob/rawhide/f/cairomm.spec for an
example of doing this. (The example also builds the HTML with the JavaScript
stripped out, but that is only so that DevHelp documentation—which plotmm
does not provide—keeps working.)
- The option “--enable-docs” to the configure script is not doing anything and
should be removed.
- Since the dependency on gtkmm is via pkgconfig, please change
BuildRequires: gtkmm24-devel >= 2.4.0
to
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gtkmm-2.4)
and
Requires: gtkmm24-devel
to
Requires: pkgconfig(gtkmm-2.4)
See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PkgConfigBuildR...,
and also
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_package_depen...
regarding versioned dependencies.
- While the URL only works with plain HTTP, the Source0 URL still works with
HTTPS. Please adjust it to HTTPS.
- This project is thoroughly dead upstream. It’s okay to keep packaging it, but
you will have a higher burden as maintainer should any issues arise.
- You should not glob the shared library in a way that would miss an soversion
bump. See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_share....
Plus, it’s best not to use extremely broad globs under shared directories.
There are some arguments for not doing so in
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_explic....
At least change:
%{_libdir}/*.so.*
to:
%{_libdir}/*.so.0*
but preferably:
%{_libdir}/libplotmm.so.0*
or:
%{_libdir}/libplotmm.so.0
%{_libdir}/libplotmm.so.0.*
- This is obsolete in all current Fedora releases and should be removed:
%ldconfig_scriptlets
- While the make invocations are acceptable, it would be even better to write
make %{?_smp_mflags}
as
%make_build
and
make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install
as
%make_install
- This is a nit-pick, but
find %{buildroot} -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} ';'
could be more simply written as
find '%{buildroot}' -type f -name '*.la' -delete
- The spec file contains mixed spaces and tabs. You can fix it with:
sed -r -i 's/\t/ /g' plotmm.spec
See rpmlint diagnostics:
plotmm.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line
44)
plotmm.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line
44)
- I think all of these rpmlint messages are spurious and require no action:
plotmm.src: W: strange-permission plotmm.spec 600
plotmm.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error 0
plotmm-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: missing-dependency-on
plotmm*/plotmm-libs/libplotmm* = 0.1.2
plotmm.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libplotmm.so.0.0.0
libplotmm.so.0.0.0
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.dot
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.dot
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.md5
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.md5
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.png
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.png
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale__coll__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale__coll__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale__inherit__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale__inherit__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.dot
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.dot
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.map:/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.map:/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.md5
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.md5
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.png
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.png
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.dot
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.dot
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.md5
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.md5
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.png
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.png
- Simple man pages explaining what the examples do would be nice, but are not
required. See rpmlint diagnostics:
plotmm-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plotmm-curves
plotmm-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plotmm-simple
and also
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_manpages.
- This should be reported upstream, although given plotmm seems to be
abandoned, I wouldn’t expect doing so to accomplish anything.
plotmm.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/plotmm/COPYING
You are required to report this, but you must not patch the file yourself;
see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address.
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Library General Public License,
Version 2.0", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention)",
"GNU
General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "FSF Unlimited
License [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or
later",
"X11 License [generated file]", "GNU Lesser General Public
License".
189 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/reviewer/2022554-plotmm/licensecheck.txt
All files with licenses other than LGPLv2 belong to the build system and
do not contribute to the License of the binary RPMs.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
(except as mentioned)
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in plotmm-
devel , plotmm-examples
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Upstream provides no tests.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[-]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
attached diff).
See: (this test has no URL)
OK: fedora-review does not understand rpmautospec
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1198080 bytes in /usr/share
Documentation should be moved to a noarch -doc subpackage.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Rpmlint
-------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Source checksums
----------------
http://download.sourceforge.net/plotmm/plotmm-0.1.2.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
896bb729eb9cad5f3188d72304789dd7a86fdae66020ac0632fe3bc66abe9653
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
896bb729eb9cad5f3188d72304789dd7a86fdae66020ac0632fe3bc66abe9653
Requires
--------
plotmm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
plotmm-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/pkg-config
gtkmm24-devel
libplotmm.so.0()(64bit)
pkgconfig(gtkmm-2.4)
plotmm(x86-64)
plotmm-examples (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libatkmm-1.6.so.1()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
libgdkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libgtkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libplotmm.so.0()(64bit)
libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
plotmm(x86-64)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
plotmm-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
plotmm-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
plotmm:
libplotmm.so.0()(64bit)
plotmm
plotmm(x86-64)
plotmm-devel:
pkgconfig(plotmm)
plotmm-devel
plotmm-devel(x86-64)
plotmm-examples:
plotmm-examples
plotmm-examples(x86-64)
plotmm-debuginfo:
debuginfo(build-id)
libplotmm.so.0.0.0-0.1.2-2.fc36.x86_64.debug()(64bit)
plotmm-debuginfo
plotmm-debuginfo(x86-64)
plotmm-debugsource:
plotmm-debugsource
plotmm-debugsource(x86-64)
Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/reviewer/2022554-plotmm/srpm/plotmm.spec 2021-11-13
08:49:05.052705243 -0500
+++ /home/reviewer/2022554-plotmm/srpm-unpacked/plotmm.spec 2021-11-11
19:10:50.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,11 @@
+## START: Set by rpmautospec
+## (rpmautospec version 0.2.5)
+%define autorelease(e:s:pb:) %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
+ release_number = 2;
+ base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}"));
+ print(release_number + base_release_number - 1);
+}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{?dist}
+## END: Set by rpmautospec
+
Name: plotmm
Version: 0.1.2
@@ -80,3 +89,7 @@
%changelog
-%autochangelog
+* Fri Nov 12 2021 Nils Philippsen <nils(a)redhat.com> 0.1.2-2
+- Uncommitted changes
+
+* Thu Nov 11 2021 Nils Philippsen <nils(a)redhat.com> 0.1.2-1
+- Revert "Orphaned for 6+ weeks"
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2022554
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, C/C++, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: PHP, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, SugarActivity, R, Python, fonts,
Java
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.1.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 5
plotmm.src: W: strange-permission plotmm.spec 600
plotmm.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error 0
plotmm-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plotmm-curves
plotmm-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plotmm-simple
plotmm-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation
plotmm.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 44)
plotmm.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 44)
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: missing-dependency-on plotmm*/plotmm-libs/libplotmm* =
0.1.2
plotmm.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libplotmm.so.0.0.0
libplotmm.so.0.0.0
plotmm.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/plotmm/COPYING
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.dot
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.dot
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.md5
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.md5
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__inherit__graph.png
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_error_curve__coll__graph.png
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale__coll__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale__coll__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale__inherit__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale__inherit__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.dot
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.dot
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.map
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.map:/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.map:/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.map
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.md5
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.md5
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__inherit__graph.png
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_h_scale_labels__coll__graph.png
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.dot
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.dot
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.md5
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.md5
plotmm-devel.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__inherit__graph.png
/usr/share/doc/plotmm-devel/html/class_plot_m_m_1_1_v_scale_labels__coll__graph.png
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 20 warnings, 3 badness; has
taken 0.8 s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022554