Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #7 from nicolas.vieville@univ-valenciennes.fr 2011-12-11 19:19:05 EST --- Hello,
New upstream version for Gnome >= 3.2 (eg F-16 and Rawhide), so new SPEC and SRPMS files and rpmlint logs.
Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-16/gnome-shell-extension-system-mo... SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-16/gnome-shell-extension-system-mo... Project URL: https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet
$ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-91-g6028eb4.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-1.fc16.src.rpm gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.src: W: invalid-url Source0: paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-91-g6028eb4.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-1.fc16.noarch.rpm gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/system-monitor-applet-config gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary system-monitor-applet-config 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
As usual thanks for your comments.
To be complete on this package, if https://extensions.gnome.org/ tends to catch all gnome-shell-extensions even in alpha stage, this package seems still needed to be build separately according to his author:
https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet/issues/83
Probably this would not be true in the future, but for the moment, this review had to go forward. I'm still seeking for a sponsor too.
Cordially,