https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
+ Package builds successful in F21 x86_64 mock
+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball: 3ca04f52c3d0d53dd37a6b9f9412659ddf3b8453e930c3c82fca25c853da7cc5
upstream tarball :
3ca04f52c3d0d53dd37a6b9f9412659ddf3b8453e930c3c82fca25c853da7cc5
+ License is valid GPLv2+ and included in its own text file LICENSE.txt
+ Package follows drupal7 packaging guidelines
Suggestions:
1) Group tag is not necessary in Fedora now and can be removed from spec file.
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag
APPROVED this package review.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component