Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715
--- Comment #24 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez <nushio(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-05-27
11:11:00 EDT ---
Hey Kalev,
I've been providing upstream with their current RPMs based on an older snapshot
of the rabbitvcs spec (In fact, I've been uploading them to the downloads list)
I don't think it requires provides/obsoletes, as a simple version check would
make this package newer than the other one, and replace it properly.
I uploaded a newer spec/srpm, making rabbitvcs-cli noarch. The rest can't be
noarch though.
I removed the unresolved dependency for rabbitvcs. It resolved here because I
wasn't properly removing and installing the rpms. I'll get a VM to properly
test the RPMs on a clean install.
SPEC:
http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs.spec
SRPM:
http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs-0.13.1-2.fc13.src.rpm
Thanks a lot for your time and observations.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.