Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156
--- Comment #9 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas(a)fi.muni.cz> 2011-12-07
15:53:41 EST ---
Re: comment #7
Regarding your plans for participation in Fedora, do you see yourself
sticking
to perl modules or might you have other things to bring in in the future?
I want to contribute packages which I need myself, but recently everything I
have needed was already packaged except some Perl modules. So for now, I will
stick with Perl modules. (context: I have been building RPM packages for at
least 12 years now, does anybody here remember Red Hat Contrib|Net, the early
community packaging effort for Red Hat Linux?).
Are there any more "leaf" packages, that don't have any
non-Fedora
dependencies?
E.g. perl-TeX-Encode, perl-Scalar-String, perl-IO-Socket-Multicast,
perl-Data-Integer, perl-Data-Float, or perl-DBD-ODBC.
> Also, they all currently have
> the problem mentioned in comment #1 (directory ownership of
> %{perl_vendorarch}... as created by cpanspec).
This is more a matter of taste.
Well, perhaps the Packaging:Perl wiki page should be modified to not have this
requirements then? (I cannot check the exact wording as Fedora wiki currently
says 503 Service Unavailable for me).
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.