Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742189
James Laska <jlaska(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jlaska(a)redhat.com
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |jlaska(a)redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from James Laska <jlaska(a)redhat.com> 2011-09-30 15:03:46 EDT ---
Taking review ownership. This is my first rubygem package review. I've done
my best to apply the ruby packaging guidelines
(
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby). However, I'm not the
authority on rubygem's, so we can certainly work through any issues raised.
[ WARN ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package
rubygem-webmock.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/webmock-1.7.6/Rakefile /usr/bin/env
From rpmlint source ... '''An included file marked as %doc
creates a possible
additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not
wanted and may be
caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the
package's documentation.'''
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestSignature/eql%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HeadersPattern/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/put_data_with_webmock%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/NetHttpAdapter/const_defined%3f-c.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/allow_net_connect%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/delete_with_webmock%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/WebMockMatcher/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestPatternMatcher/does_not_match%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/URIStringPattern/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/post_body_with_webmock%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/CallbackRegistry/any_callbacks%3f-c.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/head%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/net_connect_allowed%3f-c.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/StubRegistry/reset%21-i.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/delete%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/head_with_webmock%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/TyphoeusAdapter/enable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/CurbAdapter/enable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/StubRegistry/registered_request%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestExecutionVerifier/does_not_match%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/MethodPattern/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/URIRegexpPattern/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/HTTPClientAdapter/disable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/post_body%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestRegistry/reset%21-i.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Response/exception%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestStub/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestSignature/url_encoded%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Response/body%3d-i.yaml %3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/NetHttpAdapter/enable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestStub/has_responses%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Response/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Response/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/TyphoeusAdapter/disabled%3f-c.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/TyphoeusAdapter/disable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/BodyPattern/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/NetHttpAdapter/disable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestPattern/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestPatternMatcher/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/CurbAdapter/disable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/disable%21-c.yaml %21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Response/headers%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/EmHttpRequestAdapter/enable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/registered_request%3f-c.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestSignature/headers%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/PatronAdapter/enable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/WebMockMatcher/does_not_match%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/disable_net_connect%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Util/HashKeysStringifier/stringify_keys%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/EmHttpRequestAdapter/disable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/ResponsesSequence/end%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Response/options%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/HTTPClientAdapter/enable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/is_uri_localhost%3f-c.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/HttpLibAdapters/PatronAdapter/disable%21-c.yaml
%21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/RequestExecutionVerifier/matches%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/reset%21-c.yaml %21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/enable%21-c.yaml %21
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/WebMock/Response/status%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-webmock-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/webmock-1.7.6/ri/Curl/WebMockCurlEasy/put_data%3d-i.yaml
%3d
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 61 warnings.
From rpmlint source ... '''This package contains a file
whose path contains
something that looks like an unexpanded macro; this is often the
sign of a
misspelling. Please check your specfile.'''
[ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package
Naming
Guidelines
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [...]
[ OK ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
and meet the Licensing Guidelines
[ FAIL ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the
actual license
The upstream LICENSE file seems to indicate MIT, does this need to be updated?
https://github.com/bblimke/webmock/blob/master/LICENSE
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/MIT_License#License_terms
[ WARN ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text
of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc
Note, there are too many files listed as %doc. For example, the Rakefile
probably shouldn't be a %doc. Maybe the same with other source code?
%exclude %{geminstdir}/Rakefile
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for
this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package,
please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.
5ff10679f8e2865471fc9f9ae80dd2c5 webmock-1.7.6.gem
5ff10679f8e2865471fc9f9ae80dd2c5 webmock-rpm-1.7.6.gem
[ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into
binary
rpms on at least one primary architecture
Task info:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3394322
[ NA ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or
work on
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the
spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST
have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package
does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST
be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line
[ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except
for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging
Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply
common sense.
[ NA ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden
[ NA ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[ NA ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the
rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without
this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker.
[ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package
which does create that directory.
[ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
[ FAIL ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should
be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section
must include a %defattr(...) line.
[ NA ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
No longer applies for F13 or newer
[ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[ OK ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but
is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or
quantity).
[ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the
program must run properly if it is not present.
[ OK ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[ OK ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[ OK ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability).
[ NA ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix)
must go in a -devel package.
[ NA ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the
base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[ NA ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must
be removed in the spec if they are built.
[ NA ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a
%{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your
packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put
a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[ NA ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by
other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to
be installed should own the files or directories that other packages
may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora
should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories
owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a
good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns,
then please present that at package review time.
[ FAIL ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
Fixed, see
http://fpaste.org/GNSM/
[ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
== Ruby requirements ==
[ OK ] - Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it
depends on with a line like
[ OK ] - Pure Ruby packages must be built as noarch packages.
[ WARN ] - The Ruby library files in a pure Ruby package must be placed into
Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] . The specfile must get that path using
%{!?ruby_sitelib: %global ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts
Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] ')}
The specfile is using a different method for locating /usr/lib/ruby/*. Should
it be using %{ruby_sitelib} instead? Or does this not apply since this is
providing a rubygem?
[ NA ] - For packages with binary content, e.g., database drivers
or any other Ruby bindings to C libraries, the package must be architecture specific.
[ OK ] - Packages that contain Ruby Gems must be called rubygem-%{gemname} where
gemname is the name from the Gem's specification.
[ OK ] - The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive;
the version of the package must be the Gem's version
Source0:
http://rubygems.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
[ OK ] - The package must have a Requires and a BuildRequires on
rubygems
[ OK ] - The package must provide rubygem(%{gemname}) where gemname is the name from
the Gem's specification. For every dependency on a Gem named gemdep, the package must
contain a Requires on rubygem(%{gemdep}) with the same version constraints as the Gem
[ WARN ] - The %prep and %build sections of the specfile should be empty.
%build is empty, %prep is not ... I've adjusted per the ruby guidelines
slightly. However this is a *should* requirement, not a *must*.
[ OK ] - The Gem must be installed into %{gemdir} defined as
%global gemdir %(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem::dir' 2>/dev/null)
[ FAIL ] - The install should be performed with the command 'gem install --local
--install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0}'
This command is currently used in the %prep. I've adjusted slighty to
accommodate the *should* requirement. Feel free to use if desired.
http://fpaste.org/GNSM/
[ OK ] - The package must own the following files and directories:
%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
%{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
%{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec
[ NA ] - Architecture-specific content must not be installed into
%{gemdir}
[ OK ] - If the Gem only contains pure Ruby code, it must be marked as BuildArch:
noarch. If the Gem contains binary content (e.g., for a database driver), it must be
marked as architecture specific, and all architecture specific content must be moved from
the %{gemdir} to the [#ruby_sitearch %{ruby_sitearch} directory] during %install
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.