https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and ASL 2.0 and MPLv2.0 and
zlib
# Rizin as a package is targeting to be licensed/compiled as LGPLv3+
# however during build for Fedora the GPL code is not omitted so effectively it
# is GPLv2+.
Please be aware that the License field describes the binary package, not the
sources
[
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#Does_the_License:_tag_cover_...].
And if sources with "permissive" licenses are mixed with GPL in a single
binary, then the effective
license is most likely GPLv2. So maybe this license list can be simplified?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component