Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197
------- Additional Comments From gemi(a)bluewin.ch 2006-05-06 19:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
My only concern now with the current package naming (ghc-gtk2hs) is:
what happens
if/when one day we want to build/package gtk2hs with another Haskell compiler or
interpreter (say nhc98, jhc or hugs)? In that sense using a more generic
name for the source package (eg just gtk2hs) might be better after all?
(We can still have a ghc-gtk2hs subpackage of course even in this case.)
Yes, that
would make sense for the source package. I suppose it is not
required to have an main RPM matching the name of the SRPM.
I thought, maybe better not split the packages into separate packages for gconf,
etc... The largest package is gtk anyway.
We would have:
ghc-gtk2hs
ghc642-gtk2hs
nhc98-gtk2hs
nhc98-118-gtk2hs
etc...
This would be much simpler.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.