Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok
Alias: perl-Test-use-ok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954
panemade(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From panemade(a)gmail.com 2007-04-30 02:00 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
c49b0bbb37a6764b8b96d9fcef954ba2 Test-use-ok-0.02.tar.gz
i+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_harness(0,
'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/01-basic....ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU)
+ Provides: perl(Test::use::ok) perl(ok)
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.