Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225255
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh(a)medozas.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jengelh(a)medozas.de
--- Comment #8 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh(a)medozas.de> 2011-01-01 14:15:07 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
> any idea what the difference between this package's source tree
> and arptables-0.0.3-3 from
ebtables.sourceforge.net ? Is this package a
> fork ? Any pointers to the story behind how we ended up with two different
> ones would be much appreciated...
No idea what should be marked as a fork. These two packages have the same
basis.
Looks pretty much like arptables_jf is the fork, since it reuses the arptables
name with a _jf suffix, was created by a Redhat employee, and is also only used
by Fedora.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.