https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055005
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra(a)gmail.com> ---
Problems (blocker)
===================
* Naming: according to the guidelines[1] a snapshot package has a release tage
of the form "date-of-checkout vcs-name commit-id". In your case something like
20140120gitc112d69
In addition, depending if the package is a pre relase or a post release, the
full version must be:
# pre release
Release: 0.1.%{checkout}%{?dist}
# post release
Release: 1.%{checkout}%{?dist}
where checkout is
%global checkout 20140120git%{shortcommit}
Your package is a pre release, isn't it?
* Python requires and bytecompiling: your package is python 3 based but the
python sources are installed in a private directory. Some of the things RPM
does for packages under python system directories aren't done (properly),
namely:
- bytecompilling [2], RPM is using python 2.7 to generate the .pyc and .pyo of
your package. If you define
%global __python %{__python3}
RPM will use python3 for bytecompilling
- Python 3 runtime, your package does not have a Requires on python3. It's
generated automatically for packages under python system directory. I haven't
found a better way than an explicit
Requires: python(abi) = 3.3
* Directories: if your package requires sudo to run (and I think it does), it
should Require it. That way /etc/sudoers.d is not unowned
Requires: sudo
Non blocker
===========
I think primarely is a typo, I have only found "primarily" in my english
dictionary.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component