Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889
ajackson(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From ajackson(a)redhat.com 2007-08-16 17:07 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
* Please choose one of GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+. See
various mailing
list threads about it. Also, I'll note that one of the files you install
(/usr/share/doc/bootchart-0.9/LICENSE.compress.txt) mentions the Apache License.
Might want to figure out what's up with that.
Everything looks to be v2+, but then also links against
org.apache.commons.compress.tar, which is Apache 2.0. So I'm just claiming it's
GPLv3+ for now. I'll ask upstream what they really mean though.
* System Environment/Base seems to be the right group for the logger
Done.
* Preserve your file timestamps by using the -p flag to install(1)
Done.
* There's a new preferred buildroot of the day, it appears,
though you're using
the second-best version of it. Just figured I'd point that out since it
humors
me.
Done.
* I'll assume this builds under mock. If it doesn't
you'll find out when you
try to build into koji.
Yep.
* Also, is this package really useful without the logger subpackage?
Might
consider killing the subpackage.
Yeah, it's sort of backwards. The core package is the renderer, the logger is
the init wrapper. I could do it as bootchart / bootchart-renderer I guess?
The intent is to just have bootchart-logger always active, and let people either
render stuff themselves or go to the web UI for it on
bootchart.org.
New packages and spec at the same URL as before.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.