Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641093
--- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking(a)uos.de> 2010-10-31 07:08:17
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
But: as there are GPLv3+ files in the main package also (I'm
referring
to m4/ax_lua.m4) - even if they are just part of the source RPM - which
were not moved to any subpackage, you will have to tag the main package
with "License: MIT and GPLv3+".
Sorry, but that's incorrect. The License fields must reflect the license of the
*binary* rpm(s). Files that are not packaged (or compiled and linked into a
packaged file) don't affect the License field. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License:_field
The m4 files are only used in conjunction with the autotools during
configuration. Thus, they can be ignored when determining the license.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.