https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093503
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #3)
(In reply to Jamie Nguyen from comment #2)
> # rpmlint lua-term
> lua-term.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
> /usr/lib64/lua/5.2/term/core.so 0775L
How did you end up with this permission? My local builds and the koji
builds do not have it? I've put a chmod in my spec, but this seems strange.
Err, that's strange. I have no idea why/how my local mock builds would be
different here.
* Fri May 2 2014 Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> -
0.03-2
- Use git hash for source
- Fix .so permissions
Spec URL:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-term-0.03-2.fc20.src.rpm
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm
lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint lua-term
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpm -qp --requires ./lua-term-0.03-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
lua(abi) >= 5.2
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component