https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #6)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5)
> (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4)
> >
> > > - doc sub-package isn't noarch
> > >
> >
> > I didn't specify it as such?
>
> I don't see any 'BuildArch: noarch' line...
>
OK I'll have that fixed in the next build - sorry, I misread this the first
time.
> >
> > New files:
> >
> > spec:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nOW9XWXZwNzhEY1U
> > srpm:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nT2FJQjlhYXVTdDA
>
> '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' and 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' are used for
epel5 only.
>
Is the %if 0%{?rhel} not sufficient around these statements? Or should it
just be removed all together?
If this package isn't for epel5, you can remove all.
> Why coot-1.spec ?
> SPEC file must have same name of src-rpm.
Doh, silly google drive renaming. I'll fix in the next upload.
Why not fedorapeople?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component