https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045955
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)fastmail.com> ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #12)
Fair enough. I'd prefer not to use company names for package
names if not
really necessary (abundance of caution, trademarks and all of that). While
Debian has a lot of 'lib*' packages we also have some of these in Fedora as
well though Fedora also uses '*-libs' for fine-grained dependencies. Anyway
- no strong feelings on my side and in the end even Debian calls the package
"rocm-comgr" if I understood Debian's git repo correctly.
I just checked and you're indeed correct. Not sure why. Colour me surprised :)
Regardless, since the source package is different, it gives flexibility to
change it later.
Feel free to submit the tweaked spec
("rocm-compilersupport-devel") and I'll
do a review to move this forward.
Done, see update below
Just fyi: I recompiled the OpenCL package for F35 but was unable to
get
"clinfo" to recognize my gfx card. However this is a RX570/gfx803 and the
card is not officially supported so it might be also due to unsupported
hardware.
Yes, I think to enable the pre-vega experimental support, you need to export
ROC_ENABLE_PRE_VEGA=true or something like that.
I don't see it documented anywhere, but I noticed it in when I was trying to
debug the aarch64 build. As well, I'm told it's really buggy, so be warned :)
I should have a vega, so I can test it later.
I also reviewed the licensing and noticed some issues, so I ended up making a
pull request anyway.
Spec URL:
https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocm-compilersupport.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocm-compilersupport-5.0.0-1.fc37.src.rpm
COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mystro256/rocm-opencl/build/3487501/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045955