Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's
Foundation Kit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000
rpm(a)greysector.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From rpm(a)greysector.net 2006-10-13 14:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #12)
I'm not sure what impact this would have on other dependent
projects, and it's
for fixing something that (currently) isn't broke.
IMHO this is avoiding future trouble.
I also consulted the packaging commitee and most agree on that (but
we were
only 5 out of 10 present).
3/10 is hardly a majority.
I suggest the following: Let the package pass as is (at least wrt to
headers,
if the are other issues, they need to be fixed, of course), and I will take
the header topic upstream. So should a clash with say glibc's assumed future
extensions folder come up, the issue would have been ironed out at the source
and not the package. Do you agree?
No, I don't, but I'm not going to hold this up. If anyone has some issues later,
I'll tell them to take it up with you four.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.