Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502
--- Comment #6 from German Ruiz <germanrs(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-06-30 00:16:52 EDT
---
Here the files with the corrections...
SPEC:
http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc.spec
SRPM:
http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.src.rpm
RPM_F15_32bits:
http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.i686.rpm
RPM_F15_64bits:
http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
rpmlint outputs:
rpmlint -i SPECS/i4uc.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i RPMS/i686/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.i686.rpm
i4uc.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary i4uc-gtk
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint -i SRPMS/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i SPECS/i4uc.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i SRPMS/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i RPMS/x86_64/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
i4uc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary i4uc-gtk
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.