Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156
--- Comment #6 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas(a)fi.muni.cz> 2011-12-06
12:06:20 EST ---
Re: comment #4
my fault, I have added dependency on Test::More back. I have also bumped the
release number and added a %changelog entry as you suggest:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/tmp/perl-Env-C.spec
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/tmp/perl-Env-C-0.08-2.fc16.src.rpm
Re: comment #5
I have asked upstream to clarify the licensing.
No, I have not submitted any other packages. Should I submit them? I wanted to
go through the whole process of making a Fedora package with the single package
first.
If anybody is interested in (pre-)review, I have uploaded them to
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/tmp/fedora-packages/. Some of them cannot be built
in mock as-is, because they depend on other packages from this set, so they
have probably to be reviewed in a single request. Also, they all curretly have
the problem mentioned in comment #1 (directory ownership of
%{perl_vendorarch}... as created by cpanspec).
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.