https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430
--- Comment #6 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #4)
Yes, good points. I don't think there is a clear winner here: On
one hand it
would be nice to match the upstream "syndication-domination" source package
name, on the other hand making the source package name wildly different from
the binary package can also be confusing (especially when reporting bugs
against the package).
Yeah I know. It's your call, but my vote is for "syndication-domination" as
it's more future-proof and easier to find the upstream project. But yes, that
indeed makes it harder to find the source package from the binary package.
There's no winning here. :/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430