--- Comment #26 from Randy Barlow <randy(a)electronsweatshop.com> ---
After reading the scrollback it does sound like Shawn is lined up to do the
review so I'll defer, but I'm happy to be a standin. I'll memorize my lines.
My interpretation of the packaging rules is that SHOULD != MUST when it comes
to building the font from source. The font guidelines do use the word "MUST" in
other places so I take that to mean that this shouldn't block the package from
getting into Fedora. It's obviously better if we build the font from source,
but since there isn't a clear way to do that provided by upstream I don't think
we have to wait for https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/issues/227
solved to get this into Fedora. I would recommend allowing the package in with
the OTF files (and hopefully web files for me ☺) and then filing a BZ to build
from source if possible later.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component