https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
Using a comment to declare the license on a spec file to be GPLv3+ is perfectly
acceptable. The intent of the FPCA is to provide a blanket default license for
all contributed works (including spec files) where the contributor does not
specify a license. Since you've specified a license, this does not apply. Your
choice of license (GPLv3+) is perfectly acceptable to Fedora.
Lifting FE-Legal.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component