Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2011-09-18 18:13:13 EDT
---
I ran a series of matrix diagonalization benchmarks, and on my Intel i7-2600 at
work OpenBLAS is 9.6% faster than ATLAS, which is rather notable.
Furthermore, OpenBLAS also can thread more operations than ATLAS such as
diagonalization, which makes it 42% faster when using 4 threads. (Yes, this is
bad scaling.)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.