https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #7 from Dave Love <d.love(a)liverpool.ac.uk> ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #5)
> I notice that the RPM tries to use the user dlove.
It would be similar with your own src.rpm packages, because it's entirely
normal for the included files to be owned by the user that builds the
src.rpm, e.g. "mockbuild" or your ordinary user account.
Yes, and presumably the version that's eventually distributed will be
different anyhow. The tarball will have arbitrary file ownerships too.
%doc
An empty %doc line makes no sense, since it's a no-op.
Thanks. It wasn't meant to be empty.
> %{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1.gz
Not a big issue, but prefer
%{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1*
to allow for disabled/changed/customized compression of manual pages.
Yes, that's what I do these days. Now I've got space there, I've uploaded
new
versions to:
https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv-0.35-3.el6.src.rpm
https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component