Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193499
panemade(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |panemade(a)gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From panemade(a)gmail.com 2006-06-19 06:14 EST -------
Review for this package:-
Mock Build Results for i386
- Failed to built for i386 as package required libSM-devel
- Add libSM-devel in Requires in SPEC file
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package xpad, in the format
xpad.spec
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- MUST: The License field in the package xpad.spec file matches the
actual license file COPYING in tarball.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like README.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.