https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701567
--- Comment #4 from Adam Borowski <kilobyte(a)angband.pl> ---
Spec URL:
https://angband.pl/tmp/fedora/colorized-logs.spec
SRPM URL:
https://angband.pl/tmp/fedora/colorized-logs-2.4-1.fc30.src.rpm
Done, other than for bumping release/changelog -- should they keep trace of any
in-review version that hasn't been committed to any public repository? This
would pollute the final package with WIP changes. But perhaps I'm wrong with
applying the reasoning I'm used to in Debian to Fedora workflows? The diff
from previous attempt is whitespace only, so there are no real changes to
mention in this case. Is this good enough for now?
For the other package (vmemcache): fedora-scm-requests got denied because
"review is approved by a user that is not a packager", thus I guess it needs to
be seen by someone with actual privileges.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component