https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739290
--- Comment #12 from Wart <wart(a)kobold.org> ---
(In reply to J. Scheurich from comment #11)
Shouldn't you create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/ ?
%files
...
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/%{name}.png
This would be incorrect, as %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/ is already
owned by the hicolor-icon-theme and fedora-logos packages (at least on Fedora
30). Per the packaging guidelines, I don't believe it's necessary to add an
explicit dependency on hicolor-icon-theme or fedora-logos:
"Directory ownership is a little more complex than file ownership. Packages
must own all directories they put files in, except for:
* any directories owned by the filesystem, man, or other explicitly created
-filesystem packages
* any directories owned by other packages in your package’s natural dependency
chain"
My interpretation is that 'hicolor-icon-theme' falls under the 'natural
dependency chain' for graphical applications, as it is pulled in by two primary
window managers: gnome-icon-theme and kde-libs. Thus, no explicit Requires:
would be necessary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component