Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545
Alex Musolino <musolinoa(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |musolinoa(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Alex Musolino <musolinoa(a)gmail.com> 2009-09-23 05:33:34 EDT
---
Hi Shakthi,
I have a few comments:
- The versioned shared libraries should not be in the devel package as they are
required by the snacc binary itself. (The *.so symlinks, however, should remain
in the devel package).
- The *.ans1 files are also required by snacc and so should be moved out of the
devel package.
- Some of the documentation (*.tex and *.bib) refers to the c-lib and c++-lib
APIs (these should go in snacc-devel) and some refer to the use of various
binaries in the snacc package (these should go in snacc).
- The C/C++ examples should go in devel package (they aren't being packaged at
the moment).
- The C/C++ header files for the c-lib and c++-lib should go into the devel
package.
- There's a spelling mistake in the description (s/dample/sample/).
Another idea might be to create libsnacc and libsnacc-devel packages for the c
and c++ libraries and put just the binaries in snacc. In fact, I think this
would be the optimal solution.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.