--- Comment #29 from Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com> ---
Actually, on further thought, I do not believe it makes sense for ufoai and
ufoai-data to be separate source packages. This makes the directory ownership
logic simpler-- if all the packages (data and data-server) included can depend
on ufoai-common, ufoai-common can own /usr/share/ufoai and
I'm guessing this separation predated noarch subpackages?
The licensing needs to be checked carefully, and I have not done that (I don't
know if the License: tag breakdown that was in the spec is accurate). And a
decision needs to be reached on unbundling. So I'm not proposing this for
review. But you can grab my revised spec here:
A patch from Osipov is mirrored here, along with my configure script patch:
And a SRPM of ufoai 2.5 is here:
If I feel sufficiently motivated to double-check all the licensing and look at
the bundling over the next few days, I might even submit a new review request.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component