Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717966
--- Comment #10 from Chris Lalancette <clalance(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-12 13:24:02 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(python -c
"from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
Not needed anymore:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
Ah, I had no idea about that one. Fixed.
> %dir %attr(0755, root, root) %{python_sitelib}/psphere
> %{python_sitelib}/psphere/*
A simple:
%{python_sitelib}/psphere/
And fixed.
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > - There is no 0.1 release of psphere yet, so we should either wait for a
> > release or (uggh) get into:
> >
> >
> >
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease
>
> This is the nastiest one here. When you run "python setup.py sdist" on
the hg
> sources, you get a tarball out that is named "psphere-0.1.tar.gz". Given
the
> "Referencing_Source" link below, I feel like we should stick with that
version
> number, even though there is no official upstream release.
Nope, that doesn't cut it - upstream could release 0.1 some time in the future
with newer code
0.1 as a version number is meaningless right now - it doesn't refer to a
specific version of the code
It sounds like you're in good contact with upstream - how about suggesting a
release? That might be the simplest way of resolving it?
Otherwise, it should be python-vsphere-0.1-0.1.42accc3ffe67hg
I've written to the upstream maintainer, I'll wait on his reply.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.