https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396139
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
%if 0%{__isa_bits} == 64 or smth like this..
It's already
using that, but the Neal concern is that 64Bit would be Intel
specific.
@Neal
Looking at the code, I don't read that, looking at line 132 in fixed.h define a
non asm version of mad_f_mul. Also it's mentioned that the 64Bit FPM should
work as soon a a compiler has 64bit type. But my understanding is that it will
not perform better if not a native 64bit arch.
So using FPM=64bit seems a safe improvement over using ASM specific code on
64bit arches.
That been said, FPM=Intel is indeed x86 asm specific. I've never tested that
option.
For arm, it's defined in line 253 and is asm specific. It's also advertised as
performing better than FPM=64bit. I've only selected that option because it was
worked on recently (on the referenced bug) and I've made a runtime test that it
worked fine at the time I've bootstrapped RPM Fusion for arm. (was armv5tel and
armv7hl at that time).
Fixed the others issues locally.
@Neal, any comment on the FPM option ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component