Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219957
panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From panemade@gmail.com 2006-12-18 00:08 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. b5ac7b0e68d8d44bd737f1ba71aaee3f Pod-Strip-1.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + ./Build test t/00_load.....................ok t/10_strip....................ok t/11_replace_with_comments....ok t/99_pod......................ok t/99_pod_coverage.............ok All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.35 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.41 CPU)
+ no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED.