Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219957
panemade(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From panemade(a)gmail.com 2006-12-18 00:08 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS.
+ source files match upstream.
b5ac7b0e68d8d44bd737f1ba71aaee3f Pod-Strip-1.02.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ ./Build test
t/00_load.....................ok
t/10_strip....................ok
t/11_replace_with_comments....ok
t/99_pod......................ok
t/99_pod_coverage.............ok
All tests successful.
Files=5, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.35 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.41 CPU)
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Followed perl packaging guidelines.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.