https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <klember(a)redhat.com> ---
Yes, good points. I don't think there is a clear winner here: On one hand it
would be nice to match the upstream "syndication-domination" source package
name, on the other hand making the source package name wildly different from
the binary package can also be confusing (especially when reporting bugs
against the package).
I'm really fine either way, so if you strongly prefer
"syndication-domination"
I'd be happy to use that name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430