Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879
Steve Traylen <steve.traylen(a)cern.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steve.traylen(a)cern.ch
--- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen(a)cern.ch> 2011-02-23 13:14:57 EST
---
How does this relate to
mpich2 which contains:
/usr/lib/mpich2/bin/mpiexec
and
openmpi
which contains
/usr/lib/openmpi/bin/mpiexec
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MPI
may have some clues.
As for your last question about signifying which torque version you build
against
then this is implicit since the package in a particular EPEL or Fedora release
and
so is built against which ever torque is in that platform. You don't need the
"toruqe_XXX"
in the release.
Also the resulting requires
$ rpm -qp --requires mpiexec-0.84-1_torque_2.3.13.fc14.x86_64.rpm | grep
torque
libtorque.so.2()(64bit)
should be enough to tie version.
The pbs location changes between EPEL5 and 6 and in Fedora so I recommend some
conditionals:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag#Conditionals
However this review is by default for rawhide so it must be correct for that.
I see there is both a GPL LICENSE file but also a "LICENSE.mvapich" file which
is
probably BSD. Is this dual licensed or something ? Can you clarify.
Steve.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.