https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
Michal Ambroz <rebus(a)seznam.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|DEFERRED |---
Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #27 from Michal Ambroz <rebus(a)seznam.cz> ---
Bump to release 2.3.0
https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/radare2.spec
https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/radare2-2.3.0-1.fc27.src.rpm
As I mentioned earlier, one option is to drop the affected
functionality.
OK dropped the webui for now.
Is this an upstream opinion? Did they actually do this on purpose? My
guess is not.
To clarify, this absolutely needs fixing before the package can be imported.
This
is the upstream default behaviour. There is actually undocumented
HAVE_LIBVERSION=1 option which makes the linking of the binaries point to
versioned so libraries. I believe this should be acceptable for you.
I got it checking the Debian package ... but then I found you actually had it
in your spec file as well.
Well I'm probably just nitpicking here, but that %changelog entry
doesn't
reflect reality (perhaps Pavel would be surprised to learn that he did an
initial radare2 package?).
Yes I consider this nitpicking.
Here is the upstream commit of the line directly by Pavel Odvody -
https://github.com/radare/radare2/commit/3640a0481c1ba8b40a40eda6834ac02d...
I originally thought tito was his other nick-name. Now I guess he re-used tito
spec-file and possibly forgot to replace "tito" with "radare2" in the
changelog.
This still requires action.
I have added a comment.
I consider this nitpicking as well ... have not seen SPEC file where it would
be described which options were not used and why.
>2.2.) Bundling of C libraries
This is still a problem (perhaps rather easy) that needs to be addressed;
in particular the "provides" tags.
I have added "provides" tag
for some of the libraries I found bundled.
I do not consider this as finished, because it remains to pinpoint the versions
used.
Best regards
Michal Ambroz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component